questioning about 9/11

Should always post both sides; Snopes debunk of the Theory

Personally, you should _challenge_ ideas, thoughts, theories. It is the only true way to learn in my opinion. Sometimes doing so can generate bad karma, but in the end proving such allegations wrong or right is the only way to learn. Ask, attack, figure it out...

... the truth in these events is that we will never know what happened as we were not there and do not have the facilities (well, okay maybe collectively) to do it ourselves.

Simple thing to frag this movie; release any/all of the videos that should have seen what happened. Done.

 

ok first leav orange alown he is under the protection of schrike the king of mispeling and non puncuation.

second.i persanaly know some one that has a very good frend that just got off work that day and wus cheking out at the sacurity gate who saw the plane come in and strike .and becus he is a EMT had to go back in to try to save his co workers and frends...

third.i still run into morons that spout crap about the holocaust wus faked and present there proof (or lack of proof)to anybody that will listin.you are always guna have persons that will stedfastly dinie that somthing hapind to propel there vue of things and propell wutever cous thay are baking...

 

Schrike is my hero and I hand over the crown of non-punctualizing (is that a word) king to him however one of these days I'm gonna challenge him to a dance off to get it for my own self

 

Just think about it.

What would the Goverment have to gain by pulling this off?

Do you really think that everybody from the Air Force to the Civil Air Traffic controllers to the firefighters responding would keep this a secret?

Notice how easily they dismiss the a qualified eyewitness but lay full credibility to a person on the street who really couldn't tell the difference between a Ford or Chevy but can tell what type of plane it was.

 

no problem chaos you dident make it and it is a compeling piece.but a cupal of things to note.thows playns are made primeraly out of alumanim and if you hit it hard anuf it powders not brake apart not shater POUDERS.look at the trade centers i sow no rekidg of any playns one weel wus all i ever saw in all the after math footidg no wings no tail..but we know thay where hit by them..several witnises to the trade center crashes sead that thay saw wut looked like a small playn hit the 1st tower one sed it lookeed like a sesna..maibe the saposed footedg showd nuthing rong angal or a fussy imidg we had a camera at the gas station where i worked ones and it berly got a glims of a car speeding doun the road going 60mph tring to get a imidg of anything going over 500mph is just silly for thows typs of cameras thay arnt news cameras thay are the most inexpensiv jusnk thay can buy..back to the crash site thay also contradiked themselvs saying that there is not anuf damidg and then pointing out that it penatrated to far into the structcher???the hole you see wus probaly one of the engins thay are not alomanim and at 500 MPH would have very good penatrating power.and yes the pentagon esenchaly ate the jet it powderd on impact but the engins and energy cone of that big of a mass would penatrate into the bilding and the lack of fule is silly it all burnd up fast that wut jet fule dus burn fast.the fiers at the trade centers where all combustabls presint in the buildings after 5 minits or so.its like liter fluid it burns fast igniting the chalcol whithch then burns.now im notv saying that the govenment would never try to fool us but to do it that fast whould take them to know it wus guna hapin and ill never balev that!!!


and always question its are duty as humans to think and question.if more peopal did that maby the holacost wouldent have hapind ....

 

OMFG makes meh